Comments on: Typo3, Joomla!, and Drupal CMSs performance testing http://blogs.helion-prime.com/2008/05/19/typo3-joomla-and-drupal-cmss-performance-testing.html Just another WordPress weblog Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:11:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Textnik http://blogs.helion-prime.com/2008/05/19/typo3-joomla-and-drupal-cmss-performance-testing.html/comment-page-1#comment-687 Textnik Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:40:09 +0000 http://blogs.helion-prime.com/?p=12#comment-687 Very interesting, I have just switched from Joomla to Drupal.. :) Very interesting, I have just switched from Joomla to Drupal.. :)

]]> By: sandrar http://blogs.helion-prime.com/2008/05/19/typo3-joomla-and-drupal-cmss-performance-testing.html/comment-page-1#comment-661 sandrar Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:26:16 +0000 http://blogs.helion-prime.com/?p=12#comment-661 Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog. :) Cheers! Sandra. R. Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog. :) Cheers! Sandra. R.

]]> By: alex.shapovalov http://blogs.helion-prime.com/2008/05/19/typo3-joomla-and-drupal-cmss-performance-testing.html/comment-page-1#comment-307 alex.shapovalov Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:05:15 +0000 http://blogs.helion-prime.com/?p=12#comment-307 Hello Anthony. There are enough comparisons on Internet that compare exactly features. But it is hard to compare: what to compare? : features, usability, compare for some platform (php, ruby, java, etc) or lightweight, or only commercial CMSs? An important note: in our company we use only open-source software. I use my current experience: most wonderful CMSs [enough lightweight, mature, good api] now written in php, although I prefer Java over any other software language: joomla - user-friendly, good api, and documentation drupal - super lightweight, good documentation typo3 - extra features, good documentation Sorry if I missed your favorite one, but world is big .. and probably very soon I will like something in Ruby on Rails. Hello Anthony.

There are enough comparisons on Internet that compare exactly features.
But it is hard to compare: what to compare? : features, usability, compare for some platform (php, ruby, java, etc) or lightweight, or only commercial CMSs?
An important note: in our company we use only open-source software.

I use my current experience: most wonderful CMSs [enough lightweight, mature, good api] now written in php, although I prefer Java over any other software language:
joomla – user-friendly, good api, and documentation
drupal – super lightweight, good documentation
typo3 – extra features, good documentation

Sorry if I missed your favorite one, but world is big .. and probably very soon I will like something in Ruby on Rails.

]]> By: Anthony http://blogs.helion-prime.com/2008/05/19/typo3-joomla-and-drupal-cmss-performance-testing.html/comment-page-1#comment-306 Anthony Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:38:16 +0000 http://blogs.helion-prime.com/?p=12#comment-306 Nice CMS comparison, But WHY do you use all 3 of these. I'd like to see a Pros & Cons review. Typo3 seems excessively "guru" intensive, but what about Drupal vs. Joomla ? Cheers, Anthony Nice CMS comparison,
But WHY do you use all 3 of these.
I’d like to see a Pros & Cons review.
Typo3 seems excessively “guru” intensive, but what about Drupal vs. Joomla ?
Cheers,
Anthony

]]> By: typo3naut http://blogs.helion-prime.com/2008/05/19/typo3-joomla-and-drupal-cmss-performance-testing.html/comment-page-1#comment-305 typo3naut Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:39:46 +0000 http://blogs.helion-prime.com/?p=12#comment-305 Using TYPO3 without caching is like driving a porche with activated handbreak ;-) Nobody uses TYPO3 without caching. So, it's a really strange performance test you're doing here. Using TYPO3 without caching is like driving a porche with activated handbreak ;-)
Nobody uses TYPO3 without caching. So, it’s a really strange performance test you’re doing here.

]]>